<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNRs &#8211; one of the most confusing information concepts of our time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialmode.com/2007/12/15/dnrs-one-of-the-most-confusing-information-concepts-of-our-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialmode.com/2007/12/15/dnrs-one-of-the-most-confusing-information-concepts-of-our-time/</link>
	<description>Integrated Synthesis of Media, Society and Behavior</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:06:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Beth</title>
		<link>http://socialmode.com/2007/12/15/dnrs-one-of-the-most-confusing-information-concepts-of-our-time/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmode.com/2007/12/15/dnrs-one-of-the-most-confusing-information-concepts-of-our-time/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>DNR, Health Care Directive, Health Care Proxy, Living Will, whatever you call it, it&#039;s not the document that&#039;s the problem (which is not to say the documents aren&#039;t problematic) -- but the documents, and the gray areas they contain, are merely symptoms.

The problem is really our society&#039;s inability to talk about one of the very few things that all of us will experience no matter what - DEATH.  

Now, I&#039;m not a parent, and I was raised in a secular family, so my perspective may not speak to many people, but I have turned off the machines keeping more than one of my relatives &quot;alive&quot; (including my 62-year-old father) so I do know a thing or two about these situations.  

My father did not have a health care directive or any papers that spoke to this issue aside from a document naming me power of attorney.  What he did have however was open communication about difficult issues with his family.  There was never any doubt in any of our minds how he felt about feeding tubes and the like.  He had made it clear on a number of occasions that life support was not for him.

Now, without a document to this effect we still could have been in trouble if either my brother or I got &quot;cold feet&quot; about it or if we had been in a different hospital or with different doctors, but luckily that was not the case for us.  It also could have been a problem if either my brother or I decided to put our own feelings ahead of my father&#039;s wishes.  We were even luckier that that wasn&#039;t the case.  I&#039;m not going to say the emotions surrounding those 24- hours were not difficult, they were, but as my brother pointed out, we weren&#039;t making a decision, we were carrying out my father&#039;s wishes.  And there was a great deal of solace in that.

Everyone reading this has the ability to give their loved ones this kind of solace by having a very difficult conversation and writing it down.  That doesn&#039;t address the issues of the gray areas that the documents create, but if people truly know what is important to their loved ones the gray areas can be overcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DNR, Health Care Directive, Health Care Proxy, Living Will, whatever you call it, it&#8217;s not the document that&#8217;s the problem (which is not to say the documents aren&#8217;t problematic) &#8212; but the documents, and the gray areas they contain, are merely symptoms.</p>
<p>The problem is really our society&#8217;s inability to talk about one of the very few things that all of us will experience no matter what &#8211; DEATH.  </p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m not a parent, and I was raised in a secular family, so my perspective may not speak to many people, but I have turned off the machines keeping more than one of my relatives &#8220;alive&#8221; (including my 62-year-old father) so I do know a thing or two about these situations.  </p>
<p>My father did not have a health care directive or any papers that spoke to this issue aside from a document naming me power of attorney.  What he did have however was open communication about difficult issues with his family.  There was never any doubt in any of our minds how he felt about feeding tubes and the like.  He had made it clear on a number of occasions that life support was not for him.</p>
<p>Now, without a document to this effect we still could have been in trouble if either my brother or I got &#8220;cold feet&#8221; about it or if we had been in a different hospital or with different doctors, but luckily that was not the case for us.  It also could have been a problem if either my brother or I decided to put our own feelings ahead of my father&#8217;s wishes.  We were even luckier that that wasn&#8217;t the case.  I&#8217;m not going to say the emotions surrounding those 24- hours were not difficult, they were, but as my brother pointed out, we weren&#8217;t making a decision, we were carrying out my father&#8217;s wishes.  And there was a great deal of solace in that.</p>
<p>Everyone reading this has the ability to give their loved ones this kind of solace by having a very difficult conversation and writing it down.  That doesn&#8217;t address the issues of the gray areas that the documents create, but if people truly know what is important to their loved ones the gray areas can be overcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
