I LOVE WHEN PEOPLE LOSE MONEY

The financial issues are the ultimate consequence for huge swaths of people, policy makers, CEOs, workers, and investors.

Nothing better than the brink of financial destruction to get people moving.

We’ve had significant policy changes in less than a week!  When have you seen this much action in government?

Here’s a proxy chart of stock market action (from wikipedia):

S & P Index, proxy chat

S & P Index, proxy chat

For reference, I made this chart that plots the calendar year and continuous years of one political party that maintains the presidential office.  Spikes represent when the party changes.  Consider this against the above chart.  If you like the raw data, here it is. Volatility does not necessarily imply a change of party, but a crisis  and/or complete stagnation seems to.  Perhaps change of office is a catalyst, perhaps it’s a lagging indicator. hmmm.

Changes in the Presidential Office

Changes in the Presidential Office

All that said, I’m very empathetic to everyone who’s lost money as the result of inaction.  It sucks. It is necessary though.

I hate “corrections”.  Corrections are cute and they happen, but they aren’t CHANGE.

Review the history of the Federal Reserve to go deep into how panics, massive failures, and brink of collapse spur rapid action.

Since you’re here and researching, you might as well read up on the US Treasury.  Spend some time in the Timeline. Funny how the 2000s are so light?  When is “history” history?  I have a feeling 2005-2010 on this web page will have a few line items.

This entry was posted in analysis of behavior, business strategy, data mining, economics, politics, social science and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to I LOVE WHEN PEOPLE LOSE MONEY

  1. Mark says:

    My history teacher in HS said that the economy is the determining factor for presidential elections. When the economy is good, people will stick to the party in office. Otherwise, they’ll vote opposite.

    The 2000 election seems to contradict this, but I suppose it depends on whether you believe Gore should’ve won.

    Guess we can gather more data for this hypothesis in a few months.

  2. Donna Smith says:

    And remember that Krugman in the NYT wrote yesterday that John McCain wants to see healthcare follow the unfettered growth of innovative products and services similar to the banking and financial industries during the past several years…

    Problem is that collapse will require a re-write of your headline to say “I love when sick people die”

    We’re getting there in the healthcare mess, but won’t quite get that re-write until enouhg people with societal “standing” die or until those same people lose enough money on their way to death…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s